The judicial weighting trial to the bank of the adminstration of justice in México
Keywords:
Trial of legal weighting, Antinomies, Constitutional principles, Ex officio control.Abstract
The Mexican legal system underwent a substantial change due to the human rights reforms, causing as a direct consequence a new way of imparting justice, the foregoing, from the "rematerialization" of the maximum legal order of the country, introducing a dense substantive content from the modifications that were made to the constitution, as well as the express recognition of the legal validity of international treaties on human rights. These were expressed as normative principles, which are intended to safeguard human dignity before any act, whether public or private. By constitutionalizing rights in the Mexican legal system, implicitly, new methods for the administration of justice were opened, for example: legal argumentation; ex officio conventionality control; the agreed interpretation, among others. These methods include the legal weighting trial, which aims to resolve antinomies of principles against the specific case, to prevent the greatest impact on human rights, and with it, the legal system. In the present article the jurisdictional activity will be analyzed in front of the legal weighting trial.
Downloads
References
Alexy, R. (2014), Teoria de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Álvarez, F., Becerra J., Benítez J. (2015). El constitucionalismo ante el control de convencionalidad, su debate actual. México: Porrúa.
Atienza, M. (2012), El derecho como argumentación. México: Fontamara.
Bernal, C. (2008), El derecho de los derechos: Escritos sobre la aplicación de los derechos fundamentales. Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Carbonell, M. (Coomp.). (2014), Argumentación jurídica: El juicio de ponderación jurídica y el principio de proporcionalidad. México: Porrúa.
Diez-Picazo, L. (2011). Experiencias jurídicas y teoría del derecho. Barcelona: Ariel.
Ferrer, E. y Sánchez, R. (2016). El nuevo juicio de amparo: Guía de la Reforma constitucional y la nueva ley de amparo. México: Porrúa.
García, J. (2016). Prólogo. En Pozo, E. Derecho Procesal Constitucional (pp. 11 – 29). Bogotá: Ediciones Nueva Jurídica.
Gil, A. (2009). Escritos sobre neoconstitucionalismo. Buenos Aires: Ediar.
Guastini, R. (2013). Estudios de teoría constitucional. Trad. Miguel Carbonell. México: Fontamara.
Hart, H. (2012). El concepto del derecho. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.}
Marroquín, J. (2013). Técnica para la elaboración de una sentencia de amparo directo. México: Porrúa.
Pozo, E. (2016). Derecho Procesal Constitucional. Bogota: Ediciones Nueva Jurídica.
Prieto, L. (2011). Apuntes de teoría del derecho. Madrid: Trotta.
Prieto, L. (2013). El constitucionalismo de los derechos: Ensayos de filosofía jurídica. Madrid: Trotta.
Prieto, L. (2014). Justicia constitucional y derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Trotta.
Quinche, M. (2016). El control de convencionalidad. México: Ubijus.
Salgado, E. (2015). Manual de derecho procesal constitucional. México: Porrúa.
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Unión. Semanario judicial de la federación. Recuperado de: https://sjf.scjn.gob.mx
Vizcarra, J. (2015). Teoría general del proceso. México: Porrúa.
Zagebelsky, G. (2011). El derecho dúctil: Ley, derechos, justicia. Madrid: Trotta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Elizabeth Leticia Souza Mosqueda, Martín Moreno Reynaga and Leticia Adela Mosqueda Ochoa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
