¿Does the consciousness is the result of the function of our brain?

Abstract

At this work, I will talk about how the neuroscientists and neuropsychologists assume the conscience like a process that happens inside our head and that can be explained by following the brain activity. Their approach that wants to answer “what neuroscience understands by consciousness” is distorted such way the research deflects and answers something that wasn´t at the beginning of the work: “how our brain (mind) process the sensory information”.
The interest here is that scientists don´t notice the conceptual confusion they make and they believe that explaining and describing what they call the “process” the physical organ (brain) makes, it is possible to confer this organ conscious about that process. I mean, that the brain is able to realize the actions it performs: interprets, stores, encodes, manipulates information, among other.
To show the conceptual confusion they make, I will appeal to the Wittgenstein critic to the neuroscientist and psychologist work. Actually, the name of the profession, neuropsychologist, realize the use of confusing language to correlate –without a conceptual link-terms (neuroscience and neuropsychology) to physical states and no physical. Besides the neuropsychologist considers the brain like the “place” where occurs what they call “conscience”. Such idea just doesn´t substantive the conscience but the neuropsychologists pretend, I insist, without any conceptual link, build a physicalist definition of conscience, definition that would exceed the meaning of this term that we use in our daily life.