Supuestos teóricos en la teoría del tiempo de Kant.
Keywords:
Time., Inner sense, Synthesis., Intuition.Abstract
In this article I argue that Kant’s theory of time relies on two basic assumptions that are involved in his account of the necessary conditions of experience. I maintain that the temporal structure of experience encompasses the existence of a “tensed” series, according to which our representations occur in the present, past and future, and certain “laws of the temporal determination of experience”, according to which the temporal conditions of experience cannot be altered. These rules establish that the empirical intuitions, which are derived from inner and outer experience, cannot be stopped, reversed or anticipated. I suggest that the tensed temporal series can be deduced from the Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787) and especially from the second chapter (“System of all principles of pure understanding”) of the ‘Analytic of Principles’. Furthermore, the existence of the second assumption becomes evident in the Dissertation (1770), the ‘Axioms of Intuition’, the ‘Second Analogy of Experience’ and the ‘Postulates of Empirical Thought in general’.
Downloads
References
Bellermann, G. (1889). Beweis aus der neueren Raumtheorie für die Realität von Zeit und Raum und für das Dasein Gottes. Gärtner.
Bieri, P. (1972). Zeit und Zeiterfahrung. Exposition eines Problembereichs. Frankfurt. Suhrkamp Verlag.
Brandt, R. (1999). Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants "Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht" (1798), Kant-Forschungen 10, Berlin: F. Meiner Verlag.
Düsing, K. (1980). ‘Objektive und subjektive Zeit. Untersuchungen zu Kants Zeittheorie und zu ihrer modernen kritischen Rezeption‘. Kant-Studien, 71 (1), 1-34.
Friedman, L. (1953). ‘Kant's Theory of Time’. The Review of Metaphysics, 7(3), 379-388.
Hanna, R. (2005). ‘Kant and Nonconceptual Content’. European Journal of Philosophy, 13(2), 247–290.
Heidegger, M. (1990). Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. R. Taft (trans.). Indiana University Press. Bloomington.
Hume, D. (1739/21978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (eds.). Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. (1900ff.). Kant‘s gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe. Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed.) (29 vols. to date). Berlin: G. Reimer [later W. de Gruyter].
Kant, I. (1992). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Theoretical philosophy, I755-I770. D. Walford (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1997). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Lectures on Metaphysics. K. Ameriks & S. Naragon (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1998). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Critique of pure reason. P. Guyer & A.W. Wood (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
-------- (2007). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Anthropology, History, and Education. G. Zöller & R. B. Louden (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2012). The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Lectures on Anthropology. A. W. Wood & R. B. Louden (ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Leibniz, G. W. (1989). Philosophical Essays. Ariew R. & Garber D. (trans. and eds.). Indianapolis & Cambridge. Hackett Publishing Company.
Matherne, S. (2015). ‘Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception’. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 2(29), 737-777.
McTaggart, J, E. (1908). ‘The unreality of time’. Mind, New Series, 17 (68), 457-474.
Mellor, D. H. (1998a). ‘Transcendental tense’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 72(1), 29-43.
Mellor, D. H. (1998b). Real Time II. London. Routledge.
Melnick, A. (1989). Space, Time and Thought in Kant. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schopenhauer, A. (1969). The World as Will and Representation, (vol.1). E. F. J. Payne (trans.) New York. Dover Publications.
Schrader, G. (1951). ‘The Transcendental Ideality and Empirical Reality of Kant's Space and Time’. A Review of Metaphysics, 4 (4), 507-536.
Vaihinger, H. (1892). Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, (vol. 2). R. Schmidt (ed.), Stuttgart, Berlin, Leipzig. Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.
Walker, R. S. (2017). ‘Self and Selves’. In A. Gomes & A. Stephenson (eds.), Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self (pp. 204-218). Oxford University Press.
Waxman, W. (1991). Kant's model of the mind: a new interpretation of transcendental idealism. New York. Oxford University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Hector Luis Pacheco Acosta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
