Metafísica, violencia y ontología
Keywords:
Realism, Meillassoux, Metaphysics, Ontology, Violence, Contingency PluralismAbstract
We propose here that metaphysics is a form of fundamental violence, as discourse that denies the being of reality and imposes an abstract and idealistic conception of Being. Following the lines of the new realism or speculative realism, we counterpose to the metaphysical a conception of the ontology as a discourse that assumes and agrees to be such that, in its contingency, becoming and plurality. Ontology so understood can be the foundation of a non-violent conception of reality and found the search for peace in social life and human existence in general.Downloads
References
Adorno, T. y Horkheimer, M. Dialéctica del iluminismo, Buenos Aires: Sur, 1969.
Adorno, T. Dialéctica negativa, Madrid: Taurus, 1975.
Agamben, G. La comunidad que viene, Valencia: Pre-textos, 2006;
Bryant, L. R. The democracy of objects, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2011.
Deleuze, G. Diferencia y repetición, Madrid: Amorrortu, 1987-
______ Foucault, Barcelona: Paidós, 1987.
______ Lógica del sentido, Madrid: Paidós, 1989.
______ Nietzsche y la filosofía, Madrid: Anagrama, 1971.
Derrida, J. La escritura y la diferencia, Barcelona: Anthropos, 1989.
Gabriel, M. Fields of sense. A New Realist Ontology, Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press, 2015
______ “A ideia de Deus em Hegel”, Aurora (Curitiba), v. 23, n. 33 (2011).
______ “Neutral Realism”, The monist, 2015, 98, 181–196.
______ Trascendental Ontology. Essays in German Idealism, London: Bloomsbury, 2011.
______ Why the world does not exist, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2015 (Traducción al español: Por qué el mundo no existe, Barcelona: Pasado y Presente, 2015).
Harman, G. “The road of objects”, continent.3.1 (2011): 171-179.
______ The quadruple object, Washington: Zero Books, 2011.
______ Hacia el nuevo realismo, Buenos Aires: Caja negra, 2015.
Levinas, E. Totalidad e infinito. Ensayo sobre la exterioridad, Salamanca: Sígueme, 1977.
______ Humanismo del otro hombre, México: Siglo XXI, 1974.
Meillassoux, Q. “Deuil à venir, dieu à venir”, Critique, /1-2 (n° 704-705): 105-115.
______ Después de la finitud. Ensayo sobre la necesidad de la contingencia, Buenos Aires: Caja Negra, 2015.
Nancy, J. La experiencia de la libertad, Barcelona: Paidós, 1996.
______ El olvido de la filosofía, Madrid: Arena, 2003.
______ La verdad de la democracia, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2009.
Ramírez, M. T. Filosofía culturalista, Morelia, Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán, 2007.
______ Humanismo para una nueva época. Nuevos ensayos sobre el pensamiento de Luis Villoro, México: Siglo XXI, 2011.
Rancière, J. El odio a la democracia, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2007;
Vattimo, Después de la cristiandad. Por un cristianismo no religioso, Barcelona: Paidós, 2003.
______ Creer que se cree, Barcelona: Paidós, 1996.
Villoro, L. El pensamiento moderno. La filosofía del renacimiento, México: FCE, 1992.
______ Estado plural, pluralidad de culturas, México: Paidós, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Teodoro Ramírez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
